What do you do when you’re losing organic traffic and you don’t know why? An SEO audit from an expert like Hamlet can help, but they often come with so many recommendations that it’s difficult to execute everything. How do you know which changes are worth your time and resources?
In this post, I’ll walk you through a case study of an ecommerce site that went from a traffic downtrend to growth in a couple of months. Their traffic was at -12.8% YOY for 2016. After the first month, the traffic was at -7.3%. By the second month, it was up by +21.8%, and it’s now at +21.9% and holding. Their downtrend was reversed within six weeks of implementation:
I’ll explain how we were able to quickly reverse their traffic downtrend. Rather than the typical approach of tweaking content, optimizing keywords and building links, we focus on SEO issues that are often overlooked – site infrastructure, coding and tagging. I’ll show how our unique approach speeds up the process of SEO and allows us to measure the benefit of all the changes we make.
When we first met Chris Graham of MoreBeer.com at a trade show, his site was losing traffic to newer competitors who ranked higher in search results. These competitors charged more for lower quality home brewing equipment, so he knew price and quality weren’t the problem. The problem was SEO.
Chris sought the help of SEO experts to improve his traffic. However, his developers had difficulty executing all the SEO recommendations alongside the other projects on their plate. It was difficult to know which changes to prioritize, and they weren’t seeing the results they needed.
Our automated solution
Manual SEO primarily focuses on content, keywords and links. In our experience, most well-managed ecommerce sites are doing a fine job on content and keyword optimization, but are neglecting other important aspects of SEO. (This is due, in part, to the fact that technical resources are generally scarce.) Our approach to SEO is to build a solid foundation of good site infrastructure and coding. We call this the Foundational SEO Method.
Foundational SEO ensures that your pages can be found in search engine results in the first place. Rather than starting with keywords and content, this approach focuses on crawlability, indexation and tagging issues, among others. The goal is to get more pages ranking and receiving organic search traffic, not just higher rankings for pages that already rank. If you’re interested in learning more about foundational SEO, we offer a free SEO scan that checks your site for foundational issues. You’ll also be enrolled in a 6-part email course about our methodology.
One benefit of the Foundational SEO Method is that it can be automated by software. Our platform can apply SEO changes to thousands of pages instantaneously. We can also track the effect that different changes have over time, so that we know what changes actually helped. Because our platform has artificial intelligence built in, it learns what changes have the most impact and improves its recommendations over time – even if Google’s algorithm changes. We see that by addressing infrastructure, coding and tagging issues, we can consistently deliver traffic increases of at least 15%, because almost all ecommerce sites suffer from these problems.
Before I dive into the results that MoreBeer saw, a quick note on terminology. At RankSense, we only consider a page optimized if it ranks and drives traffic. We don’t look at a ranking factor checklist and call a page “optimized” – we only look at results. So when I say a page “became optimized,” it means a page started receiving traffic where it wasn’t receiving any before.
Which recommendations made the difference for MoreBeer?
We have a standard set of technical issues that we check for every client, and then we customize our research per site based on the findings from the free scan. Almost every page on MoreBeer.com had at least one issue to fix. To figure out which factors had the most impact, we grouped pages by the types of changes that we made, and monitored the number of new users coming from the organic search channel:
Our software was implemented on January 4, so you can see the traffic before we made changes and after the changes were picked up by search engines. For any line that stays at more-or-less the same level before and after, that means those changes didn’t have much of an effect on the number of new users. (This is somewhat of an oversimplification that ignores factors like seasonal variability.) The biggest uptick is in the green line around February 11. This was a group of over 1200 pages that had updates to the canonical tag, meta description, and title tag. For reference, compare it to the blue line – we changed the canonical tags and title tags on this group of 2,000+ pages – and they didn’t see the same impact.
Although our software was implemented on January 4, we didn’t roll out all of the changes immediately. Most changes were made on January 10, but several hundred were made on January 30, and we continued making changes as late as April.
Meta description improvements
Back to the blue and green groups – was the difference in performance coming from the meta description updates? At first glance, that appears to be the main difference between those two groups.
To delve further into this question, we looked at the optimized pages. (Remember our definition of an optimized page?) We separated both groups into pages that were already optimized (already receiving traffic before we made any changes) and pages that had just become optimized (were not receiving traffic before but are now).
For the blue group (which had changes made to the canonical and title tags), pages that were already performing continued to receive traffic, but very few pages were optimized by the changes. On the other hand, in the green group, several hundred pages became optimized. This is the power of the Foundational SEO Method – pages that weren’t receiving any traffic started to drive traffic.
I’ll take a second to mention that our software is able to write meta descriptions by summarizing content from the page. We use natural language processing (similar to the technology that powers Siri) to pull snippets from the page’s existing content and write meta descriptions automatically. This surprises some people, but our machine-written snippets have been found to out-perform manually written meta descriptions in A/B testing experiments. So, when we have a client who is missing meta descriptions, we can easily generate them without having to spend time and resources writing them.
We found that 706 pages on MoreBeer were missing meta descriptions, so we had the software write those and add them to the pages. We also made updates to the existing meta descriptions of 685 pages. Pages that had been completely missing meta descriptions saw a traffic gain:
We can break the green group down further. We found that 70% of the pages in the green group were related to brewing techniques – important content marketing in the homebrew business. It turned out that the brewing technique pages had more new users than the other 30% of pages:
This chart shows that the brewing technique pages had more new users than the other pages in the green group. The brewing technique pages had no meta descriptions prior to this, so this data suggests that adding meta descriptions to important content marketing pieces helped these pages rank higher and drive traffic. However, when we looked closer, the meta descriptions weren’t the only factor that helped these pages rank.
Reclaiming link equity
Some of the pages in the green group (16%) were receiving more link equity because we repaired broken backlinks on the site. For every client, we look for broken backlinks: pages that no longer exist but that some external source links to. Whenever possible, we redirect the dead URLs to a relevant live page on the site. This passes the link equity along to the live page, boosting its reputation in the eyes of search engines.
We found that the pages that were receiving 301 redirects were more likely to have an increase in traffic.
Let’s revisit the graph from above, separating out all the pages that were receiving redirects (red line):
We can see now that the uptick in the green line is a bit more modest, and that a significant portion of overall growth in traffic can be attributed to 301 redirects that were added for 412 dead URLs. (Note that pages receiving 301 redirects were separated from all the groups and combined in the red line.)
Broken backlinks are common on ecommerce sites. Links are built over time, but pages get moved and that valuable link equity gets lost. Again, we take advantage of automation to simplify the process of mapping broken backlinks to live pages on the site.
For each 404 URL, our software looks for a matching page on the live site so that it can redirect the dead link to a live link. The software uses multiple algorithms which compete against each other. This may sound a little technical, but it just means that we take different approaches to try to find a match, then we choose the best one – all automatically. The matches are scored by the software, and the highest scoring one “wins” and will be redirected to. A member of our team checks the matches to see how closely the 404 URL matches the live page and scores them (i.e. perfect match, close match, etc.).
For sites with a lot of broken backlinks, this gives us the results of a link building campaign with a fraction of the time and effort.
Both of the issues that had the most impact for MoreBeer – missing meta descriptions and broken backlinks – are tedious to fix manually. Writing thousands of meta descriptions takes serious time and effort, as does finding a good match for each 404 URL. If you aren’t certain that there will be any benefit, it probably doesn’t seem worth the effort. In any business, there are a myriad of other issues to devote your time to where the benefit is more certain (and where the work isn’t so boring!).
Our automated approach simplified the task of validating those changes. When we begin working with a new client, we have a good idea of what changes will be the most effective, but our software is able to verify that our educated guesses are correct. SEO is usually somewhat of an art, but our approach makes it more of a science, breaking it down into a methodical process of testing hypotheses, making observations and drawing conclusions. Foundational SEO isn’t able to replace content efforts, but it compliments them, maximizing the value that you get out of your content.
The SEO fixes that will have the biggest impact vary from site to site. We knew that MoreBeer had opportunity to reverse their downtrend because their free scan showed that they had a good number of foundational SEO issues to fix. For other clients, the biggest issues might be duplicate content or poor crawlability. By taking a methodical approach to foundational SEO issues, we’re able to identify a variety of problems and validate our fixes.
- While producing high quality content is essential, ignoring tedious foundational SEO work can cost you dearly. We took MoreBeer from a -12.8% YOY traffic downtrend to +21.9% YOY and holding by addressing SEO tagging issues.
- Measuring the outcome of various SEO fixes gave us the confidence that we caused the improvements, and provided insights into which changes were the most effective so we can continually improve our SEO process.
- The changes that made the biggest difference for MoreBeer were implementing 301 redirects for broken backlinks and adding meta descriptions to pages that didn’t have them. This is, understandably, the kind of mind-numbing work that no marketer or business owner wants to do, but that our platform will gladly do with no complaints. 🙂
MoreBeer’s growth has been holding at +20-22% YOY for four months at the time of this writing. Here’s Chris to tell you how it turned out: